Monday, October 03, 2011
We're Here. We Sneer. Get Used to It.
The group has copied the organizational structure of the Arab Spring uprisings. It's a headless group that is like a collective and makes decisions using committees and strict representational democracy. There's also an Occupy the Fed movement which is more of a libertarian thing happening concurrently and sort of related. You can see live footage of the Occupy Wall Street peeps here.
The big question is: What do they want? And the group says it's not about that, but that's exactly what it's about. If this is the lefty version of the Tea Party, then they need to push for things. They need to prove that they vote. For as much as they want this to be like V is for Vendetta, it can't be. We'll need to make the process change either through legislation or capitalism. Legislation means that this collective needs to find candidates that speak for them and get them elected. I'm not a huge fan of this, because this will make Congress, and this sounds crazy, but even more divided than it is now.
Of course, if they want to try through capitalism and either boycott certain companies or work to educate others about writing to their Congressman. See, this is really an image problem. The Occupy Wall Street people are for income equality, and for consumer protection and for lowering the debt and for letting their kids have the same opportunities they did. So why can't we all get along? Well probably because it's hard for middle America to connect with these people who aren't showering and protesting against the cops and using IPhones to tweet instantly. Not that I'm judging any of this, but this isn't going to make people feel closer. Nor are the Free Mumia signs. That's not what we're talking about. And besides, he's a killer. Rest in Peace, Danny Faulkner.
Also, there's a lot of press about the NYPD's handling of these protestors. Some seem to be outraged by these strong arm tactics, like locking up the protestors from the Brooklyn Bridge. In the video, it's clear that the supervisor is telling them they could be arrested. The crowd is so loud, it's hard to hear the guy, but whose fault is that? Should they be required to get louder speakers if the crowd is large? I don't think so. I'd just like to say that when the cops move on the protestors, that decision is made by guys much higher up than those in blue shirts.